New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

3 Books Explore How to Make Smart Choices

Books and recommendations from Scientific American MIND

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Choosing between colleges or job offers is challenging: one job may offer more prestige—seemingly the logical choice—but our gut seems to be pulling us in another direction. So which do we trust? In Feeling Smart: Why Our Emotions Are More Rational Than We Think (PublicAffairs, 2014), economics professor Eyal Winter proposes that the best choices often come when we combine logic and emotion. Combining research on decision making, human behavior and evolution, Winter explores how our emotions interact with rational thinking. He finds that we can often trust our gut instincts to lead us to good choices and that our emotional reactions can work in our favor. In one study conducted by Winter, he found that our inclination to become angry actually increases when we can benefit from the emotion. “In other words,” he writes, “there is logic in emotion and often emotion in logic.”

Often, however, we are faced with group, not individual, decisions that involve and affect our loved ones, business and economic ventures, or social activities. In Wiser: Getting beyond Groupthink to Make Groups Smarter (Harvard Business Review Press, 2015), Cass Sunstein, a professor at Harvard Law School, and Reid Hastie, a professor of behavioral science at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, delve into the psychology of group decision making—why the hive mind can make mistakes and how to avoid those pitfalls. First, Sunstein and Hastie explain that instead of correcting errors in reasoning, the group voice may amplify mistakes or become divided on an issue, leading to discord. The authors then offer advice to guide the group to better choices, by, for instance, giving quieter members a stronger voice or combining opinions and solutions from different individuals to forge new ideas.

Still, much of our decision-making processes occur outside of our conscious awareness. In Unthink: And How to Harness the Power of Your Unconscious (Hodder & Stoughton, 2015), evolutionary biologist Chris Paley explains the interesting, sometimes bizarre, ways in which our unconscious mind influences our choice of friends, how we receive good news or even what foods we buy. Paley also offers advice on how to use this understanding of the unconscious to our advantage. For instance, he explains that you are more likely be asked out on a date if you discreetly mimic your potential mate's body language and speech.

Victoria Stern is a contributing editor at Scientific American Mind.

More by Victoria Stern
SA Mind Vol 26 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Roundup: Choosing Wisely” in SA Mind Vol. 26 No. 3 (), p. 71
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0515-71a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe