3-D-Printed Windpipe Gives Infant Breath of Life

A 3-D-printed windpipe signals a future of body parts manufactured on demand

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Kaiba was six weeks old in 2011 when he stopped breathing and turned blue. His parents rushed him to the hospital, where they learned that his left bronchial tube had collapsed because of a birth defect. The attacks recurred for weeks until January 2012, when surgeons implanted a 3-D-printed tube to hold the baby's airway open. The tube will dissolve after a few years inside the boy's body, giving his bronchus time to grow strong enough for normal breathing. This is the first use of such an implant to aid tissue reconstruction and was reported in a May edition of the New England Journal of Medicine.

The trachea's 20 interlinked rings of cartilage keep a newborn's airway open as it branches into the lungs, rather like the steel rings that support a vacuum cleaner hose. But rarely, a portion is floppy and collapses. Implanted stents can prop open the airway from within but often still result in compromised breathing from the irritation they cause. Kaiba's doctors contacted Glenn Green, a doctor who, along with his colleagues at the University of Michigan, was developing custom-fit tubes to wrap around a collapsed trachea as an irritant-free way to hold the airway open.

Green and his colleagues thought 3-D printers could make an artificial trachea because of the ease of manufacturing the rings that make up the organ's tubular structure. The researchers printed tracheae from biocompatible plastic and tested them in piglets.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For Kaiba, the team first took a CT scan of the infant's airways and used the data to print a cast. Using that cast, the scientists next created a fitted, flexible sleeve to stabilize the airway. The final step was to sew the tissue of Kaiba's bronchus to the inside of the sleeve, which required an emergency-use approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “When we put the splint on, we saw his lungs move for the first time,” Green says. Like Kaiba, the use of 3-D-printed medical devices and body parts is still in its infancy, but Green believes the technology has “gigantic potential.”

About Marissa Fessenden

Marissa is a freelance science journalist in Bozeman, Montana. She was an editorial intern with Scientific American from June 2012 through June 2013. Follow on Twitter @marisfessenden

More by Marissa Fessenden
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 3This article was published with the title “A Baby Breathes Easier” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 3 (), p. 22
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0913-22a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe