New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

3-D-Printed Windpipe Gives Infant Breath of Life

A 3-D-printed windpipe signals a future of body parts manufactured on demand

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Kaiba was six weeks old in 2011 when he stopped breathing and turned blue. His parents rushed him to the hospital, where they learned that his left bronchial tube had collapsed because of a birth defect. The attacks recurred for weeks until January 2012, when surgeons implanted a 3-D-printed tube to hold the baby's airway open. The tube will dissolve after a few years inside the boy's body, giving his bronchus time to grow strong enough for normal breathing. This is the first use of such an implant to aid tissue reconstruction and was reported in a May edition of the New England Journal of Medicine.

The trachea's 20 interlinked rings of cartilage keep a newborn's airway open as it branches into the lungs, rather like the steel rings that support a vacuum cleaner hose. But rarely, a portion is floppy and collapses. Implanted stents can prop open the airway from within but often still result in compromised breathing from the irritation they cause. Kaiba's doctors contacted Glenn Green, a doctor who, along with his colleagues at the University of Michigan, was developing custom-fit tubes to wrap around a collapsed trachea as an irritant-free way to hold the airway open.

Green and his colleagues thought 3-D printers could make an artificial trachea because of the ease of manufacturing the rings that make up the organ's tubular structure. The researchers printed tracheae from biocompatible plastic and tested them in piglets.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For Kaiba, the team first took a CT scan of the infant's airways and used the data to print a cast. Using that cast, the scientists next created a fitted, flexible sleeve to stabilize the airway. The final step was to sew the tissue of Kaiba's bronchus to the inside of the sleeve, which required an emergency-use approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “When we put the splint on, we saw his lungs move for the first time,” Green says. Like Kaiba, the use of 3-D-printed medical devices and body parts is still in its infancy, but Green believes the technology has “gigantic potential.”

About Marissa Fessenden

Marissa is a freelance science journalist in Bozeman, Montana. She was an editorial intern with Scientific American from June 2012 through June 2013. Follow on Twitter @marisfessenden

More by Marissa Fessenden
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 3This article was published with the title “A Baby Breathes Easier” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 3 (), p. 22
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0913-22a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe