3. Vaccines

Douglas Sacha Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Childhood vaccines have transformed medicine. Smallpox has been globally eradicated, polio has been eliminated from the U.S., and diphtheria and congenital rubella have been almost wiped out in North America. Yet some preventable diseases—most notably measles—are managing to make a comeback in certain pockets of the U.S. after a small number of parents have refused to give their children routine immunizations. In the article leading this section, a pediatrician and an epidemiologist detail how intentionally unvaccinated children are helping drive epidemics. And once misinformation takes hold, it can be hard to dispel—especially the thoroughly debunked work linking certain inoculations with autism, as Scientific American staff editor Dina Fine Maron writes in the next piece. She takes on the "facts or fiction" about vaccination risks. In the final piece of the section, Scientific American staff editor Mark Fischetti illustrates how, although vaccination rates for U.S. children were slipping before 2011, many school immunization laws seem to be having a positive effect. Remaining gaps in vaccination coverage leave community members who are ineligible for vaccines—including adults who have weak immune systems and babies who are too young to get their shots—vulnerable to potentially life-threatening disease.

Read More:

SA Special Editions Vol 26 Issue 5sThis article was published with the title “3. Vaccines” in SA Special Editions Vol. 26 No. 5s (), p. 47
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican122017-3Jepo093h1sadgtVbh9r7o

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe