100 Years Ago: Science of the Unfit

Innovation and discovery as chronicled in past issues of Scientific American

JUNE 1961

Optical Maser
“All conventional light sources are essentially noise generators that are unsuited for anything more than the crudest signaling purposes. It is only within the last year, with the advent of the optical maser, that it has been possible to attain precise control of the generation of light waves. Although optical masers are still very new, they have already provided enormously intense and sharply directed beams of light. These beams are much more monochromatic than those from other light sources; at their best optical masers rival the very finest electronic oscillators as a source of a single frequency. The development of optical masers is moving so rapidly that they should soon be ready for a wide variety of applications. —Arthur L. Schawlow” This device is today called a laser. Schawlow was a co-winner of the 1981 Nobel Prize in Physics.

Virus Genes
“Less than a decade ago there was no reason to doubt that virus genetics and cell genetics were two different subjects and could be kept cleanly apart. Now we see that the distinction between viral and nonviral genetics is extremely difficult to draw, to the point where even the meaning of such a distinction may be questionable. As a matter of fact there appear to be all kinds of intermediates between the ‘normal’ genetic structure of a bacterium and that of typical bacterial viruses. Recent findings in our laboratory have shown that phenomena that once seemed unrelated may share a deep identity. —François Jacob, André Lwoff and Jacques Monod”
Jacob shared the 1965 Nobel Prize for medicine.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


JUNE 1911

Science of the Unfit
“Ever since the late Sir Francis Galton gave us his science of Eugenics, which in its most literal sense means ‘good breeding,’ the scientific students of mankind, the directors of insane asylums and hospitals, and criminologists the world over, have been compiling statistics to show not only the danger of permitting the marriage of criminals, lunatics, and the physically unfit, but the effect upon mankind. Fortunately Eugenic associations here and abroad have done much to clear away the popular prejudices inevitably encountered in such educational work and to prepare the ground for legislative action.”
Full article is available at www.ScientificAmerican.com/jun2011/eugenics

A Nation of Railroads
“The first of the transcontinental railroads across the western deserts and mountains were built rather more for military and governmental reasons than through any hope of their immediately earning a sufficient amount to make the enormous investment in their construction profitable. Since private owners of capital were not inclined to be philanthropic, the government had to hold out inducements to them to invest their money by giving them land grants and making them loans of five of the seven major roads. These days, competition between these seven roads, both for freight and passenger business, is very keen.”

Global Blanket
“Svante Arrhenius has advanced an ingenious theory to account for the glacial periods which have marked several stages of geological history. According to the experiments of Langley, the carbon dioxide and the water vapor, which the atmosphere contains, are more opaque to the heat rays of great wave lengths which are emitted by the earth, than to the waves of various lengths which emanate from the sun. Arrhenius infers that any increase in the proportion of carbon dioxide and water vapor in the atmosphere will increase the protection of the earth against cooling and will consequently raise the temperature of its surface. The theory assumes that the earth’s atmosphere was poor in carbon dioxide and water vapor during the earth’s cool glacial periods, and rich in these gases during hot periods.”

JUNE 1861

War and King Cotton
“We recently published an article on cotton and the war setting forth the conviction that if the struggle should be a prolonged one, it would put an end to the pre-eminence of the cotton States in the supply of this important staple. For this assertion one or two of our subscribers in the cotton States are denouncing us as enemies to the South. It will ultimately appear, when the events now transpiring have reached their practical solution, that those who have ‘precipitated the South into revolution’ will have done more to uproot their institutions than all the noisy abolitionists to be found in the country. We firmly believe that the permanent interests of the cotton States are secure only in the Union.”

Scientific American Magazine Vol 304 Issue 6This article was published with the title “50, 100 & 150 Years Ago” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 304 No. 6 (), p. 91
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican062011-6WpdSZvwhEJp7OtDYf0n36

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe