50, 100 & 150 Years Ago: July 2020  

Darwin’s legacy on nerves and behavior; the epic tale of monuments

A plan for the Grand Pacific Hotel in Chicag0

1870: A plan for the Grand Pacific Hotel in Chicago. Construction finished in 1873 in substantially this form. Yet by 1895 the needs of the fast-growing city had eclipsed the need for this once impressive edifice, and much of it was torn down.

Scientific American, Vol. XXIII, No. 1; July 2, 1870

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

1970

On Nerves and Behavior

“Charles Darwin argued that since man had evolved from lower animals, human behaviors must have parallels in the behaviors of lower forms. Darwin's radical insights stimulated studies of animal behavior, opening the way to experimentation that was not feasible in man. Crayfish, leeches, various insects and snails have the great advantage that their nervous system is made up of relatively few nerve cells (perhaps 10,000 or 100,000 compared with the trillion or so in higher animals). In these animals one can begin to trace, at the level of individual cells, not only the sensory information coming into the nervous system and the motor actions coming out of it but also the total sequence of events that underlies a behavioral response. —Eric R. Kandel”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Kandel shared the 2000 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.

1920

A Mineral's Value

“For centuries asbestos was but a curiosity—a mystic mineral paradox, to all appearances a solid rock yet composed of silk-like fibers so rugged in themselves that the millions of years of the earth's cooling, hardening and cracking did not break these slender threads.

The almost inestimable economic value of asbestos proceeds from the fact that it possesses such an unparalleled combination of heat- and wear-resisting qualities. The perfection of the heat (and cold) insulations and their application to thousands of America's power plants is saving power and saving fuel—millions of dollars' worth annually.”

1870

Debating Darwin

“The Abbe Moigno is a scientific authority and is at the same time a Catholic of unquestioned orthodoxy, which last act adds significance to his publishing in Les Mondes the following notes: ‘In view of the antagonism developed in some quarters against scientific investigation as tending to infidelity, the expressions of one confessing a faith so conservative, are of interest. The grounds upon which Christian scientific men can stand secure, were admirably stated by Professor Dana in his recent lecture, in which the subject of Darwin's theory was considered. In the course of his remarks he stated that belief in a development theory was not atheism. That the facts of science clearly indicate some plan of development; that Darwin's book was a work of great merit. Let no one fear scientific investigation.'”

EPIC TALES

Monumental Buildings

1997: One of the Petronas Twin Towers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, seen under construction. The towers were the tallest in the world from 1998 to 2004. Credit: Scientific American, Vol. 277, No. 6; December 1997

Social cohesion enables people to produce physical testaments to individuals, events or organizations. Humans apparently have a bit of an ego problem, having littered the planet with these—occasionally very beautiful—monumental structures. It is true that more advanced engineering can show off the builder’s (and owner’s) sophistication, although it must also be noted that accumulating the resources to build on a grand scale is too often the result of inequality within the society, if not the handiwork of enslaved people (and we’ll skip over the gory bits of the Colosseum in Rome, shall we?). Still, every great structure is eventually eclipsed by something more glorious or more technically challenging.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 323 Issue 1This article was published with the title “50, 100 & 150 Years Ago” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 323 No. 1 (), p. 71
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0720-71a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe