6. Evolution vs. Creationism

David Bise Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


More than a century and a half after the publication of Charles Darwin's ground-breaking book On the Origin of Species, the theory of evolution through natural selection has been tested and confirmed innumerable times. It is a cornerstone of modern biology. As the evolutionary biologist Theodosius Dobzhansky observed, "nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution." And yet the teaching of evolution in schools continues to come under attack from creationists. Their arguments do not stand up to scrutiny, however. Moreover, the teaching of evolution is constitutionally protected in the U.S. Nevertheless, American science teachers still face considerable pressure to compromise their presentations on this fundamental concept. What is the best way to oppose religiously motivated threats to scientific thinking? Perhaps not surprisingly that, too, is a matter of debate.

Read More:

SA Special Editions Vol 26 Issue 5sThis article was published with the title “6. Evolution vs. Creationism” in SA Special Editions Vol. 26 No. 5s (), p. 93
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican122017-45gAF7IEAWLV0maX5GFvmc

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe