New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

A Batter for a Batter: Heat Raises Odds of Being Hit by Pitch

Hot weather primes pitchers for vengeance

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The black-and-blue rule of baseball—if your pitcher beans our batter, our pitcher will bean yours—it turns out, is highly dependent on the weather. Richard P. Larrick, a professor at Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business, and his colleagues examined every at bat in every Major League Baseball game since 1952, keeping an eye peeled for retribution pitches. They then calculated that of the roughly 190,000 at bats that occur every season, about 1,550 result in the batter being struck by a pitch. When they overlaid game data with weather data, they discovered that batters have a 27 percent chance of being hit by a retribution pitch in 95 degree Fahrenheit weather, compared with an only 22 percent chance in 55 degree F weather. “We don’t think that heat increases aggression in general,” Larrick says, “but that it increases a special type of aggression: retribution.”

The findings jibe with results from previous studies on the psychological effects of heat, which have shown that people in hotter rooms have a lower threshold for revenge and are more likely to view others’ actions as hostile. That may explain why violent crime increases in the summer months, although researchers have yet to determine whether temperature plays a role or if attacks go up because more people are interacting on the streets. Larrick says that his research could help get to the bottom of the mystery. “Studying baseball is helpful because it removes the confounding variables of real life. It’s controlled,” he says—as long as fans stay in their seats.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe