A Better Defense

Shoring up security means more than high technology

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Visiting the White House is not unlike preparing to board a plane. Bags pass through x-ray machines and visitors through metal detectors. The White House, though, benefits from some augmentation: specifically, so-called backscatter x-ray technology, in which devices capture the radiation bounced back from objects. It can generate more detailed images than conventional x-ray machines and can even call out organic materials, such as liquid explosives.

Such technological fixes have rapidly come to the fore in the wake of recent terrorist revelations--and not for the first time: backscatter was widely touted as a solution to hijackings and other air travel incidents as long ago as the 1980s. Other high-tech solutions--millimeter-wave sensors for personal screening, quadrupole resonance to detect things like bombs in shoes, neutron-bombarding devices to precisely establish the chemical makeup of objects, as well as a host of others--can detect an array of threats, for a price. Already the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has installed at least 100 trace detectors, designed to pick up minute quantities of various suspect compounds on clothing, luggage or people, at major airports throughout the country. But ultimately, technology can never provide the perfect security answer.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe