A California Tree for the Worlds Fair

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The following account of a noble tree and its ignoble fate has been transmitted to this part of the Union from California. The tree was discovered about twenty miles from a place called Murphy's Camp :— It measures at the ground ninety-eight feet in circumference, and eighty-five ft. at ten ft. from the earth, which size it holds for 100 ft. It is 300 ft. high, though the top has been broken off. There are many trees in this vicinity higher than that, from 50 to 70 ft. in circumference. It is estimated that this tree would square 25 ft. at the butt, and consequently a cut of 12 tt. in length would make ninety thousand teet of lumber. A party of men are now at work in taking off the bark, for 50 ft. in height, in sections, so that it can be put together again. It is about one foot in thickness, and will be sent to the World's Fair, where it will be put up, and have the California specimens exhibited in it. Thirty feet in diameter is quite a room, large enough to hold political mass meetings_in; "s" before a presidential election. It is estimated by those who have counted the rings, that the tree is not less than 6,500 years old, or five hundred years older than this world, according the vulgar notion.— It must have been something of a tree when Adam and Eve went round to name the pro-productiors of the forest." The beautiful city of Oswego, we regret to state, has been visited with a most destructive fire.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 44This article was published with the title “A California Tree for the Worlds Fair” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 44 (), p. 347
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican07161853-347f

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe