New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

A Century of Flight: How Scientific American Helped the "Aeroplane" Get Off the Ground [Slideshow]

Scientific American observes the 100th anniversary of a competition that would bring manned flight to the masses, spawn the aviation industry, and forever change the way we live and travel

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


View slideshow

Around the turn of the last century, people suspected that inventors were hard at work building flying machines that could take them up into the sky and (more importantly) deliver them safely back to the ground. The editors of Scientific American were among those curious about these devices and frustrated by the seclusion in which these inventors worked, particularly bicycle magnates Orville and Wilbur Wright.

Despite their successful flights that fateful afternoon of December 17, 1903, the Wrights kept their invention under wraps, for fear of a competitor stealing their design and making a fortune. As a result, only a handful of people ever got to see the Wright flying machine.

In a bid to bring manned flight into the public domain, Scientific American in 1908 established what became a highly coveted trophy for a flying competition consisting of three competitive legs with varying degrees of difficulty. Scientific American editors and members of the Aero Club of America traveled to Hammondsport, N.Y., on July 4 that year and witnessed the first public flight of an "aeroplane" (as it was called at the time) flown by Glenn H. Curtiss.

Curtiss won all three legs of the Scientific American competition (flying three different planes) and permanent possession of the trophy, which now rests in the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C. Although not as much of a household name as the Wright brothers, Curtiss has been called the "father of naval aviation" for his role in building the first U.S. Navy aeroplane , the Curtiss 1911 A-1 Triad Amphibian.

By 1917, Curtiss had two factories in New York State—Buffalo and Hammondsport—employing more than 20,000 workers building aeroplanes and engines. In 1930 he received the Medal of Honor for his significant aviation achievements, which included being the first man ever to be issued a pilot's license. The rest, as they say, is history.

View slideshow

Read more about how Scientific American helped get the "aeroplane" off the ground

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe