New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

A Dinosaur with a Taste for Its Own Kind

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A nine-meter-tall carnivorous dinosaur probably wouldn't need much help establishing a ferocious reputation. But researchers writing in the journal Nature have discovered another trait of the species Majungatholus atopus that is sure to do just that. It seems that this dinosaur, which roamed Madagascar between 65 and 70 million years ago, was a cannibal.

Raymond Rogers of Macalester College and his colleagues analyzed 21 fossilized bones that were recovered from sites in Madagascar over a 10-year excavation period. The remains, which came from two Majungatholus individuals, have distinct markings that match the size and spacing of teeth in another Majungatholus skull (see image). In addition, smaller grooves on the bones correspond to the sharp serrations on the creature's teeth. "We have the smoking gun in the form of diagnostic tooth marks, and we can definitely rule out all of the other carnivores known to have been on the scene," Rogers explains.

Another dinosaur, Coelophysis bauri, had previously been accused of cannibalism based on interpretations of fossils that suggest the presence of a juvenile individual's remains in the stomach region of an adult Coelophysis. But that evidence needs to be reexamined, Rogers states, although it's still possible that that species, too, fed on its own. As for Mujungatholus, exactly why it devoured its own kind remains unclear. Says Rogers: "We don't know whether Majungatholus killed both of the individuals in our sample, or opportunistically scavenged their remains."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe