New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

A Firm Stand

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


American chestnut trees once made up a quarter of eastern U.S. forests, with four billion of them stretching from Maine to Florida. Virtually all these chestnuts were killed within 50 years by a fungus introduced to the U.S. in 1904. But wildlife biologist Nathan Klaus of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources recently discovered half a dozen American chestnuts near President Franklin D. Roosevelt's Little White House in the southern end of the Appalachians, with the largest some 40 feet tall. “You occasionally find a single American chestnut in the wild, but such a large group of them is unprecedented,” Klaus says. He notes that the chestnut-killing fungus may not have thrived on the dry, rocky mountaintop where this stand dwells. The American Chestnut Foundation announced May 19 it would breed the trees with blight-resistant Chinese chestnuts in the hopes of eventually developing a hardier, mostly American hybrid.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 2This article was published with the title “A Firm Stand” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 2 (), p. 30
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0806-30c

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe