New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

A Frothy Mucus Nest Protects Frog Eggs from Drought

Frogs whip up climate-beating slime nests for their offspring

Mucus nest and sandpaper frog.

Mucus nest and sandpaper frog.

John Gould (left); NHP and Photoshot Science Source (right)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Frothy mucus might not sound like the most inviting living space, but for some frogs' offspring it is a lifesaving refuge from drought. The amphibians often lay their gelatinous eggs in pools of water to provide the moisture needed to develop properly—but those pools can dry up. “The biggest cause of [frog] offspring mortality is desiccation,” says University of Newcastle ecologist John Gould.

When studying frogs in Australia's Watagan Mountains, Gould was surprised to find evaporated puddles where eggs thrived for days, swaddled in nests their mothers whip up by aerating mucus secretions with their toes. “You could see embryos still alive and kicking,” he says.

Scientists had previously hypothesized that several frog and toad species use foam to protect eggs from desiccation, but few studies had tested the idea. So Gould and his colleagues monitored 641 mucus nests built by the sandpaper frog, Lechriodus fletcheri, to determine whether embryos were surviving dry mountain conditions. They also conducted the first laboratory experiments to closely follow eggs' development in nests deprived of water.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The team found that the embryos could indeed successfully develop in a dried-up pool if the eggs encasing them were protected by slimy frog foam. In some nests stranded on dry land, embryos even endured well after full development, until a pool was replenished by rain—and a few successfully hatched into tadpoles. “The froth nest acts almost like a life-support system that sustains the viability of the eggs,” Gould says. He also found that larger nests provided more protection, and eggs closer to the core could survive longer. The new work is detailed in Ichthyology & Herpetology.

Elisa Barreto Pereira, an ecologist at Brazil's Federal University of Goiás who was not involved in the study, says froth nests could be crucial to helping frogs survive as the climate changes. “The foam nest is an important adaptation,” she says—one that evolved several times in different frog groups and continents when Earth's average temperature peaked about 55 million years ago.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe