A Gamma-Ray Burst, in Detail

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Just like ET before it, NASA's High Energy Transient Explorer (HETE) satellite phoned home. As a result, astronomers were able to get the most detailed pictures yet of a gamma-ray burst and the evolution of its afterglow. In a report published today in the journal Nature, researchers describe a gamma-ray burst known as GRB021004 and note that it was 10 to 100 times more powerful than they expected.

Gamma-ray bursts typically last less than a hundred seconds, and much of the information gathered about them so far has relied on data from afterglows, which are lower-energy forms of light that can linger for days or weeks following the events. But after HETE relayed news of GRB021004, a telescope in Japan was collecting information from it in less than four minutes. Over the next few days, scientists focused more than 50 telescopes around the world on GRB021004. "If a gamma ray burst is the birth cry of a black hole, then the HETE satellite has just allowed us into the delivery room," says Derek Fox of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, Calif., and the lead author of the report.

The quick response allowed the astronomers to witness both the demise of the gamma-ray signal and the start of the afterglow signal. Surprisingly, they found that in the first half hour of its existence, the afterglow actually gained energy. "Gamma-ray bursts must be many times more powerful than we previously thought," notes George Ricker of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The authors say their findings support the so-called collapsar model for gamma-ray bursts, which posits that the explosions result from stars that are collapsing to form black holes. In this scenario, the star that led to GRB021004 would have been 15 times as massive as our sun. Comments Anne Kinney of NASA, "This stunning observation places us in the fiery throes of a star explosion, peering through the debris at a newly formed black hole within."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe