A Great Leap in Graphics

The quality of 3-D computer graphics is poised for a quantum jump forward, thanks to speedier ways to simulate the flight of light

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For those of us who frittered our formative years away blasting blocky space invaders, video games today can widen the eyes and slacken the jaw. The primitive pixelated ape of Donkey Kong has evolved into a three-dimensional King Kong of startling detail. Some newer Xbox 360 games render their lead characters from an intricate mesh of more than 20,000 polygons, each tiny patch drawn dozens of times a second with its own subtle texture, shading and gloss.

Beyond the booming game industry, the evolution of graphics has lifted interactive software for design, engineering, architecture, medical imaging and scientific visualization to new heights of performance. Much of the credit belongs to advances in graphics processing units (GPUs), the microchips at the heart of computer video cards that transform 3-D scenes into 2-D frames at speeds faster than a trigger twitch. As the rendering capabilities of GPUs soared, so did the revenues of ATI, NVIDIA and Intel, which make the most popular models.

W. Wayt Gibbs is a contributing editor for Scientific American based in Seattle. He also works as a scientific editor at Intellectual Ventures.

More by W. Wayt Gibbs
Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 2This article was published with the title “A Great Leap in Graphics” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican082006-7lyxGtM6MEUI4KkhvssuKv

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe