New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

A Killer Water Filter

Novel materials promise better access to clean water around the world

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


ONE IN SIX PEOPLE lacks access to clean water worldwide, making diarrheal illness—a direct result of poor sanitation—the leading cause of death globally. Water filters would do the trick, but they are generally too expensive to distribute in great enough quantities. By combining nanotechnology with cheap materials such as cotton and tea bags, however, researchers have recently developed mobile water filters that can be manufactured for less than a penny.

Most conventional water filters are equipped with small pores that “trap” bacteria, but the pores have a tendency to get clogged, which requires expensive maintenance. Yi Cui found a way to use silver and electricity to kill the bacteria instead. Cui, a materials scientist at Stanford University, dipped woven cotton that he purchased at Walmart into a mixture of electrically conducting carbon nanotubes and silver nanowires. Silver works as an effective bactericide in part because silver ions damage genetic material. Additional killing power comes from a light electric current (powered by two nine-volt batteries) that breaks the bacterial cell membranes. In the lab, Cui's filter killed more than 98 percent of E. coli bacteria in water. Because the pores in the cotton are large, the filter is 80,000 times faster than filters that trap microbes.

An even cheaper invention is a kind of a tea bag filled with carbon granules coated with a microbicide. Researchers at South Africa's Stellenbosch University figured out a way to encapsulate the chemicals within nanofibers to increase their surface area and help them trap toxic substances and bacteria. The filter fits in the neck of an ordinary bottle and costs about half a U.S. cent apiece. Each bag is good for cleaning one liter of polluted water. The technology is currently being tested by the South African Bureau of Standards, after which the researchers plan to dole it out to communities in need.

Melinda Wenner Moyer, a contributing editor at Scientific American, is author of Hello, Cruel World! Science-Based Strategies for Raising Terrific Kids in Terrifying Times (G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 2025).

More by Melinda Wenner Moyer
Scientific American Magazine Vol 303 Issue 6This article was published with the title “A Killer Water Filter” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 303 No. 6 (), p. 48
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1210-48a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe