New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

A Monster Comes out of Hiding

Researchers solve a long-standing phylogenetic mystery

COURTESY OF SEAN McMAHON Yale University

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In 1955 amateur fossil hunter Francis Tully discovered an exceedingly odd specimen in Mazon Creek, a collecting hotspot near Chicago. Imprinted on Tully's rock were the remains of a tubular creature with stalk eyeballs and a long mouth apparatus terminating in a feature that resembled an alligator clip. Dubbed the Tully monster, the 300-million-year-old specimen later became Illinois's official state fossil. Despite its popularity, though, researchers have made neither heads nor tails of it—until now.

According to findings published in Nature, the organism traces its evolutionary legacy to modern-day lampreys: jawless, bloodsucking fish. Researchers arrived at this conclusion after analyzing 1,200 Tully monster specimens—most about 15 to 20 centimeters long—and realizing that what was previously assumed to be part of the creature's gut is actually a notochord, a primitive backbone. The notochord's downward curvature pointed the team toward lampreys, which also share that physiological quirk.

Victoria McCoy, a paleontologist at the University of Leicester in England who led the study while at Yale University, is not ready to declare the case closed, however. “We still know very little about how the Tully monster lived,” she says. “But we can now use modern lampreys and other fishes as analogues and, we hope, start to better understand the mysterious lifestyle of this ancient monster.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe