New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

A New Assault on HIV

The constant search for weak points in the virus yields ideas for a wholly new class of drug

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The field of virology spends a substantial chunk of its resources inspecting every minute step of the HIV life cycle--from the binding and entry of the virus into an immune cell to its replication and release of a new virus from the host cell and, finally, the seeking of a new cell on which to prey. The last major new class of anti-HIV drugs emerged about a decade ago with the introduction of the protease inhibitors, which curb the action of an enzyme that is critical to a late stage of viral replication.

At the time, a few members of the HIV research community wondered whether protease inhibitors could provide the basis for a cure. The ingenuity of the virus has proved the hollowness of that hope. As many as half of HIV-positive patients under treatment in the U.S. were found in one study to be infected with viruses that have developed resistance to at least one of the drugs in their regimen. Clinicians can choose from more than 20 pharmaceuticals among protease inhibitors and two classes of drug that prevent the invading virus from copying its RNA into DNA, thereby sabotaging viral replication. Combinations of these agents are administered to counteract the virus's inherent mutability, but that strategy does not always ward off resistance to the medicines, including the protease inhibitors. "Given increasing resistance to protease inhibitors, it's of paramount importance to identify new ways to interfere with the virus replication cycle," asserts Eric Freed, a researcher in the HIV drug resistance program at the National Institutes of Health.

Gary Stix is the former senior editor of mind and brain topics at Scientific American.

More by Gary Stix
Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 6This article was published with the title “A New Assault on HIV” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 6 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican062006-6nLfoVIt3Eg8KyIrqPzQ8A

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe