A New Assault on HIV

The constant search for weak points in the virus yields ideas for a wholly new class of drug

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The field of virology spends a substantial chunk of its resources inspecting every minute step of the HIV life cycle--from the binding and entry of the virus into an immune cell to its replication and release of a new virus from the host cell and, finally, the seeking of a new cell on which to prey. The last major new class of anti-HIV drugs emerged about a decade ago with the introduction of the protease inhibitors, which curb the action of an enzyme that is critical to a late stage of viral replication.

At the time, a few members of the HIV research community wondered whether protease inhibitors could provide the basis for a cure. The ingenuity of the virus has proved the hollowness of that hope. As many as half of HIV-positive patients under treatment in the U.S. were found in one study to be infected with viruses that have developed resistance to at least one of the drugs in their regimen. Clinicians can choose from more than 20 pharmaceuticals among protease inhibitors and two classes of drug that prevent the invading virus from copying its RNA into DNA, thereby sabotaging viral replication. Combinations of these agents are administered to counteract the virus's inherent mutability, but that strategy does not always ward off resistance to the medicines, including the protease inhibitors. "Given increasing resistance to protease inhibitors, it's of paramount importance to identify new ways to interfere with the virus replication cycle," asserts Eric Freed, a researcher in the HIV drug resistance program at the National Institutes of Health.

Gary Stix is the former senior editor of mind and brain topics at Scientific American.

More by Gary Stix
Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 6This article was published with the title “A New Assault on HIV” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 6 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican062006-6nLfoVIt3Eg8KyIrqPzQ8A

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe