New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

A New Blood Test for TB Could Save Millions of Lives

It can be performed at a clinic, yield same-day results and may cost less than half the current test

Tuberculosis is especially a problem in developing countries. In 2014 in Bangladesh about 640,000 people carried the disease.

PROBAL RASHID Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As much as one third of the global population is currently infected with the bacterium that causes tuberculosis (TB), a disease typically concentrated in the lungs and characterized by weakness, fever, coughing and chest pain. About 9.6 million new infections occurred in 2014, the most recent year for which numbers are available. Roughly 1.5 million people died of TB that same year. The ability to easily, inexpensively and accurately diagnose TB is of utmost importance, but the most commonly used method fails, at least to some extent, on all three counts. A new blood-based technique might considerably rein in this epidemic.

The conventional TB test scans for bacterial DNA in coughed-up mucus, or sputum. But some children struggle to produce a sample on request. The test also can miss TB in people simultaneously infected with HIV because the telltale bacteria may exist in numbers too low to detect or outside the lungs. In addition, the test costs up to $10, a prohibitive fee in many developing countries. As a result of these constraints, a large percentage of TB cases are diagnosed late or not at all, leaving serious infections untreated and more liable to spread.

Two years ago the World Health Organization put out a call for an improved TB diagnostic. In response, Purvesh Khatri, a Stanford University medical professor, and his colleagues combed through the human genome and found three genes that distinguish active TB from other diseases. The team then developed a way to detect these genes in blood.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


According to their study, published in the Lancet Respiratory Medicine, the test is equally sensitive among patients with and without HIV coinfection and correctly detected TB in 86 percent of pediatric cases. Additional points in favor of a blood assay include that it can be performed at a clinic and yield same-day results, unlike the case for a sputum test. That is especially advantageous in the developing world, where showing up for even a single appointment presents a tremendous burden. “You want to be able to initiate treatment immediately,” says Sheela Shenoi, a Yale University professor of medicine focused on AIDS.

The technology has not been used in the diagnosis of new patients and may be difficult to scale up, but in the meantime, Khatri has filed a patent for the test. He thinks it could cost less than half as much as the current one. “If this three-gene signature could be developed into a point-of-care test,” Shinoi says, “it would revolutionize TB diagnostics.”

Jessica Wapner is a science journalist. She is author of Wall Disease (2020) and The Philadelphia Chromosome (2014), both published by The Experiment. Wapner lives in upstate New York.

More by Jessica Wapner
Scientific American Magazine Vol 314 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Drawing for a Remedy” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 314 No. 5 (), p. 22
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0516-22

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe