A New French Aeroplane Record

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Saturday, the 26th of October, M. Henri Farman's new aeroplane, which we illustrated in the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN of that date, accomplished a record-breaking flight of 771 meters (2,529.52 feet) above the drill ground of Issy les Molineaux, near Paris. The flight was made in 53 seconds, or at an average speed of 32.54 miles an hour. Earlier in the day M. Farman made a flight of 363 meters (1,190.94 feet) in. 30 seconds, which was equivalent to a speed" of 27.06 miles per hour. The flight of nearly half a mile is by far the longest which has ever been made in Europe with an aeroplane, and it marks a long stride forward in the navigation of the air by a heavier-than-air machine, especially when the fact is borne in mind that it came as the culmination of a long series of flights made during a number of days without any accident or damage to the machine. On October 15, M. Farman flew 935 feet; on the. 25th, 984 feet, and on the 29th, the distances given above. When this machine is compared with that of the sculptor Delagrange, which earlier in the year made some short but successful flights of considerable promise, the Farman aeroplane is found to have a somewhat greater supporting surface (6971' square feet as against 645.84). Like the former machine, M. Far-man's consists of two long superposed surfaces 33.45 feet in length by 6.56 feet wide, followed, at a distance of about 15 feet, by two other superposed surfaces 19.68 feet long by 6.56 feet wide. The same type of doublil horizontal rudder is fitted at the front, and the forward pair of planes also carry the 50-horse-power motor and the 6.56-foot propeller, the pitch of which is 3.6 feet. The weight lifted per horse-power with this machine ranges from 22 to 25 pounds, supposing that the motor developed its full power. The probabilities are, however, that the lift per horse-power was somewhat greater. The amount lifted per square foot of supporting surface was about 1%, pounds, which is considerably less than most modern French aeroplanes are capable of lifting. Notwithstanding the large supporting surface, the speed of the machine was as great, and probably greater than that of any of its foreign predecessors. The fact that it exhibited good stability goes to show that this type of machine is one which apparently has a future.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 97 Issue 19This article was published with the title “A New French Aeroplane Record” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 97 No. 19 (), p. 320
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican11091907-320b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe