A New Human Ancestor?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: FRED SPOOR; copyright National Museums of Kenya

Researchers working in Kenya have unearthed fossils that could upset a long-held view of human origins. According to a report published today in the journal Nature, the remains represent a previously unknown hominid genus and species from which modern humans may have descended. For decades that distinction belonged to Australopithecus afarensis¿a species typified by the famous 3.2-million-year-old Lucy skeleton. But the new discovery, dubbed Kenyanthropus platyops, comes from roughly the same time interval and thus renders Lucy's ancestral status far less certain.

Meave Leakey of the National Museums of Kenya and her colleagues recovered the Kenyanthropus remains¿which include jaws, teeth and a skull dated to between 3.2 and 3.5 million years old¿from mudstone sediments in northern Kenya¿s Turkana basin. (The skull is apparently the oldest almost complete early human cranium known.) Subsequent analysis revealed a creature rather different from Lucy and her kin. In particular, Kenyanthropus has a far flatter face and smaller molar teeth¿feeding-related differences that suggest the two groups could have coexisted without competing for food resources.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Now that we have a new form of early hominid from the same time period that is quite distinct from afarensis, the anthropologists will have to decide which of these forms of early human actually lies in our ancestral tree," University of Utah geologist Frank Brown, who dated the fossil, remarks. "It cannot be both."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe