A New Lathe for Turning Hollow Ware

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


From the peculiar kind of cut required to turn hollow ware, no self-acting lathe has heretofore been successfully used for this kin of turning. It is commonly performed in a common lathe with a hand tool, and is very laborious, especially in turning ware of an oval form, where tne hand of the workman must accommodate itself to the deviations o the surface, and be subjected to a constan jerking motion. The turning of hollow ware differs from most other kinds of turning, as the principle object to be attained is a clear brigh surface; the ware is always made thin to save the weight of metal, and the portion turned offshould be taken from all sides equally, even though the interior surface should be an irregular curve, the object being to remove the crust on the surface of the casting, so as to prepare it for the process of tinning. The improvements made in these lathes are the invention of Peter Teal and Charles Tyler, of Philadelphi , Pa. The important features of their invention are in the manner of holding and operating the cutting tool, and in the chuck which secures the ware in the lathe. The cutter is self-feeding and self-adjusting, and is held in its place by an arm from a slide frame, upon the lathe. It is made yielding to accommodate itself to the inequalities of the surface of the ware by means of a coiled spring upon the frame, the depth of the cut being regulated by a guide roller lol-loiving th" cutter. The ware to be turned is held in a chuck of a peculiar construction. It is so arranged that the ware may be moved first with a circular motion for the purpose of turning the centre and bottom of the ware, and then gradually taking an oval or elliptical motion as the cutter proceeds toward the edge or top of the article to be turned. The motion may be kept circular when the ware is circular, and in both instances is self adjusting, no attention by the workman being requisite but to set the lathe tor the kind of turning required. Many parts of this lathe are too complex to describe without the aid oi engravings, consequently we can here give but a limited idea of the invention, and its operation. Further information may be obtained of the assignees of the inventor, W. P: Cresson Co., Philadelphia, Pa.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 41This article was published with the title “A New Lathe for Turning Hollow Ware” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 41 (), p. 324
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican06251853-324

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe