A Pathogen's Wily Ways

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis, the world¿s top three infectious killers, shimmune system, convert the cell into a microbial manufacturing plant. After multiplying, the microbes break out of the cell and go on to invade other cells, repeating the process. Details of these events have eluded investigators because such intracellular pathogens are difficult to study. As a result, researchers have yet to develop effective vaccines against them. But according to a report published in the November 3 issue of the journal Science, scientists have finally learned how one microbe, the food-borne bacterium Listeria monocytogenes (which can lead to meningitis and death), accomplishes this feat. The new findings could shed light on how other deadly pathogens operate.

Listeria bacteria, it turns out, have a remarkable mechanism for establishing infection. First they prompt immune system scavenger cells called macrophages to ingest them such that they wind up enclosed in bubbles called vacuoles inside the cells. The Listeria then make a toxin known as listeriolysin O, which is used to rupture the vacuole, gaining entry into the cell¿s interior. It subsequently coopts the cell machinery in order to replicate. What has long baffled microbiologists, though, is why the toxin doesn¿t also puncture and kill the cell. Indeed, the fact that the toxin targets the vacuole is what makes Listeria virulent. Earlier research revealed that substituting the bacteria¿s listeriolysin with a related toxin from a bacterium that operates outside of cells resulted in Listeria that broke out of the vacuole but then also bored through the cell¿s outer membrane, killing the cell. The altered strain was rendered avirulent, because the immune system was able to eliminate the exposed pathogens.

In the new study, Amy Decatur and Daniel Portnoy of the University of California at Berkeley sought to identify what makes listeriolysin so special by examining the DNA sequences of the two toxins. Their comparison revealed a key difference. The listeriolysin bears a protein tag known as a PEST sequence, which essentially tells the cell to get rid of it. Thus, before the toxin has a chance to attack the cell membrane, the cell¿s maintenance crew disposes of it. Decatur and Portnoy demonstrated the importance of the PEST tag itself by mutating it so that the cell could not recognize it. As a result, the mutant bacteria quickly destroyed the host cells, at which point the immune system launched a fatal attack against the Listeria. In the end, the wild Listeria were 10,000 times more virulent than the mutants. "It¿s a great example," remarks Portnoy, "of how bacteria have taken advantage of the host¿s biology to enhance their pathogenicity.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe