New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

A Precursor of RNA?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: after Science

DNA and RNA are the molecules that evolution chose to store all genetic information. But at the time when life began, the prebiotic soup may have contained other information molecules, which were ultimately superceded by present day nucleic acids. In last week¿s Science, Albert Eschenmoser and colleagues from La Jolla and Zurich show that a molecule they call TNA could have been one such alternative.

TNA, like DNA and RNA, has a sugar phosphate backbone that carries information as a sequence of four different bases (A,T,C and G for short). But instead of ribose (as in RNA) or deoxyribose (as in DNA), both five-carbon sugars, TNA contains threose, a four-carbon sugar (see illustration above). In TNA, the phosphate link between sugars occurs between the third carbon and the second carbon of neighboring threoses (3¿-2¿)--not between the third carbon and the fifth carbon (3¿-5¿) of adjacent sugars, as is the case in DNA and RNA.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers chemically synthesized TNA in a number of steps and found that complementary TNA molecules pair up to Watson-Crick double helices. Moreover, they form double helices with complementary RNAs and DNAs. This ability is important because it shows that TNA could serve as a template to reproduce (replicate) itself. Scientists generally assume that life started in an "RNA world." But because four-carbon sugars like threose can be made from two identical two-carbon units, TNA or related polymers maybe developed more easily. Thus, TNA and its relatives could have been the precursors of RNA on primitive Earth.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe