A Precursor of RNA?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: after Science

DNA and RNA are the molecules that evolution chose to store all genetic information. But at the time when life began, the prebiotic soup may have contained other information molecules, which were ultimately superceded by present day nucleic acids. In last week¿s Science, Albert Eschenmoser and colleagues from La Jolla and Zurich show that a molecule they call TNA could have been one such alternative.

TNA, like DNA and RNA, has a sugar phosphate backbone that carries information as a sequence of four different bases (A,T,C and G for short). But instead of ribose (as in RNA) or deoxyribose (as in DNA), both five-carbon sugars, TNA contains threose, a four-carbon sugar (see illustration above). In TNA, the phosphate link between sugars occurs between the third carbon and the second carbon of neighboring threoses (3¿-2¿)--not between the third carbon and the fifth carbon (3¿-5¿) of adjacent sugars, as is the case in DNA and RNA.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers chemically synthesized TNA in a number of steps and found that complementary TNA molecules pair up to Watson-Crick double helices. Moreover, they form double helices with complementary RNAs and DNAs. This ability is important because it shows that TNA could serve as a template to reproduce (replicate) itself. Scientists generally assume that life started in an "RNA world." But because four-carbon sugars like threose can be made from two identical two-carbon units, TNA or related polymers maybe developed more easily. Thus, TNA and its relatives could have been the precursors of RNA on primitive Earth.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe