A Preventive to Potato Rot

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Since the dreadful blight to the potato erop of Ireland some years ago, when the entailed consequence of famine almost decimated the population of that unhappy land, agriculturists, agricultural chemists, and scientific gentlemen of all countries, have experimented upon this favorite and important esculent, with a view of ascertaining the causes, and preventing the ravages, of the potato rot. Numerous theories of its causes have been advanced, and any number of remedies proposed; but it would appear that, beyond the improvements in the selection of the seed, the cultivation of the vine, and the gathering and preserving the potato with increased care and skill, but slight benefit toward the great end sought has been derived from these sources. What the most distinguished agriculturists and savans of the world have failed to accomplish by the most intense thought and experiment, has, it appears, been effected, like the development of numerous facts in mechanics and science, by accident; or rather, such an effect was produced from this cause as set science to work in the solution of the problem, and to give it a practical tendency. A few years ago, the English papers published a statement that some boys in Belgium, for amusement, inserted peas in seed potatoes which they were planting, and that in due time both peas and potatoes grew together, producing an unustfal yield of peas. These were gathered, and the potatoes were allowed to ripen, and upon digging proved to be entirely sound, while the same sort, in other parts of the field, were badly rotten. This fact coming to the knowledge of Mr. J. Jackson, of Leeds, England, prompted him to submit a series of samples of diseased and sound potatoes to careful chemical analysis, and he invariably found that the diseased potatoes, as compared with the healthy ones, exhibited a marked deficiency of nitrogen and of nitrogen-ized matter in every instance, and also a great deficiency, as compared to the published analysis of the potato, by Liebig and others, made some years before. " From that result," ays Mr. Jackson, in his published report, " I inferred that the potato being inherently deficient in nitrogen, if it were inoculated with a substance intrinsically rich in that element, as peas are, during the mutual decomposition and chemical changes of the substances of both plants, in the process of their germination and growth, a sufficient evolution of nitrogen from the pea would take place, and be absorbed by combining with and supplying the deficiency of that element in the potato, and thus communicate, as it were, its equivalent in that way, and counteract its tendency to disease." Mr. Jackson then tried the experiment practically, by procuring several kinds of potatoes for sets whole, and inserting four or five peas (according to the size of the potato) deep into the fleshy part of the set, taking care to avoid the eye, and planting them in the usual way. The result was perfect success, with an extraordinary yield of both peas and potatoes, the latter being, almost invariably, large and healthy, and free from every trace of disease. These potatoes were laid on a wooden floor in a house, where they remained all winter, and in the following spring they were found to be all sound and healthy, and were employed as sets again in the same way, with the same result.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 37This article was published with the title “A Preventive to Potato Rot” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 37 (), p. 293
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05221858-293c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe