A Prominent Man of Science Gone

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Sir George Cayley, recently (Dec. 15) deceased in England, at the advanced age of 84 years, was a prominent inventor and a man of science. He invented a hot air engine, long before the Ericsson was dreamed of, and so enthusiastic was he in the belief that air was superior to steam as a motive agent, that he made experiments in the hope of perfecting his engine up to a period close upon his decease. Many eminent inventors and men of science, like Sir George, oftentimes get upon the wrong track, and go round and round in the same path, like the moon around the earth, and yet think they are going ahead&— always advancing&—because they keep the same face to the great center of attraction. He was a firm believer in the ultimate success of electricity as a motive agent in machinery, and he invented a very excellent instrument used in London for examinations of impure water3, such as those of the river Thames.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 21This article was published with the title “A Prominent Man of Science Gone” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 21 (), p. 168
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican01301858-168b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe