A "Missing" Element Found

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When Earth was formed from large colliding rocks, the impacts released tremendous energy, melting the elements in the fledgling planet. The iron sank into the core, where it stayed, and the rock, mostly silicate, floated on the surface. So, too, siderophiles¿or those elements that are more soluble in iron¿are thought to have followed the iron inward. Vanadium and chromium apparently did, based on comparisons with chondrites, old meteorites left over from the rocks that created the planets. But other iron-loving elements, among them calcium and scandium, proved more abundant in the mantle surrounding Earth's core. Scientists have always had a hard time accounting for how these strange elements, known as refractory siderophiles, ended up where they did. But now they've got a theory. Jon Wade and Bernard J. Wood of the University of Bristol report on niobium in today's issue of Nature.

Based on its chemical properties, niobium should be a refractory siderophile, and so there should be as much of it in the mantle as is found in chondrites. Instead it is missing. Some geochemists have suggested that the rare element is hidden in a reservoir deep in the mantle¿although most are hard-pressed to explain how such a reservoir might have come to exist. But Wade and Wood went back to basics, studying niobium's behavior in the laboratory. They found that when subjected to the high pressures and temperatures like those in the center of the Earth, niobium acted more like normal siderophiles than the refractory kind. Thus, they conclude that it, too, dissolved in the iron core. Case solved.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe