New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Meet the tiny fish that looks like Mr. Snuffleupagus

A strange, tiny fish that resembles the famous Sesame Street character camouflages amid red algae thanks to its flamboyant reddish “hairs”

A small, seahorselike fish covered in orange filaments that look like hairs.

Scientist David Harasti first saw the species now formally identified as Solenostomus snuffleupagus in 2003 in Papua New Guinea.

David Harasti

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For decades a tiny fish haunted marine biologist David Harasti. During a dive off Papua New Guinea in 2003, he caught a glimpse of something red and shockingly hairy and immediately knew it was something scientists hadn’t yet described. But from there, things got trickier: during six more visits, he couldn’t find it again. It took enlisting Great Barrier Reef divers and scouring the shelves of the Australian Museum to determine that the fish wasn’t imaginary. Finally, scientists have confirmed the new species—and enshrined it in the annals of science as Solenostomus snuffleupagus, a nod to its remarkable resemblance to Big Bird’s beloved friend.

“It was so easy to say, ‘Yeah, this looks like Snuffleupagus.’ I mean, it’s almost identical. It’s scary,” says Graham Short, an ichthyologist and taxonomist at the California Academy of Sciences and the Australian Museum, who, with Harasti, wrote the paper formally describing the new species. “We may have had a few drinks and decided to e-mail Sesame Street Australia. And they answered the following day!”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


S. snuffleupagus, which measures between one and 1.5 inches long and is found in the southwest Pacific Ocean, is now the seventh known species of ghost pipefish. These animals are relatives of seahorses and known for their remarkable camouflage—likely the evolutionary function of the new species’ dramatic look. “They resemble bits of floating red algae,” Short says. “You can easily see a lot of divers going by this fish and not realizing it’s an actual fish.”

But a fish it indeed is—albeit a mysterious one. Scientists don’t know much about ghost pipefishes in general, Short says, and have mostly operated off observations from divers. Like seahorses, females are larger and males brood eggs, Short says. CT scans taken by him and other researchers have found skeletons of smaller fishes in the guts of ghost pipefishes, including S. snuffleupagus. “For such a cute little thing, it’s actually a predator,” Short says.

The scientists considered several traits to confirm that S. snuffleupagus is its own critter, not a known species in disguise. The CT scans, for example, revealed that the new species had more vertebrae than its relatives. An analysis of its mitochondrial DNA suggested that S. snuffleupagus diverged from its closest relative some 18 million years ago.

And then, of course, there’s the obvious. “It’s so hairy compared to other species,” Short says. It’s not mammalian hair but what scientists call filaments on the hard, bony plates that act almost as an exoskeleton for ghost pipefishes, which don’t have traditional fish skin.

“Other species can be a little bit hairy in certain spots, like under the snout,” he says. “But this one took the hairy form all the way. I mean, it looks ridiculous.”

Meghan Bartels is a science journalist based in New York City. She was previously a senior reporter at Scientific American. Before that she spent more than four years as a writer and editor at Space.com, as well as nearly a year as a science reporter at Newsweek, where she focused on space and Earth science. Her writing has also appeared in Audubon, Nautilus, Astronomy and Smithsonian, among other publications. She attended Georgetown University and earned a master’s degree in journalism at New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program.

More by Meghan Bartels

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe