New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

A Sense of Time Requires a Sense of Space

Our brain may not be able to conceptualize time without a proper understanding of space

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

We often think of the abstract idea of time in the concrete terms of space, saying we are “looking forward to the weekend” or “putting the past behind us.” These adages may be more than just metaphors. A study published in January in Psychological Science suggests that thinking of space may be a necessity to conceptualize time. When people's minds are not able to accurately understand space, researchers found, they have difficulty with time as well.

People with a condition called left hemispatial neglect ignore the left side of space—not remembering the left half of a scene or even not eating off the left half of their plate—after an injury or stroke in their brain's right inferior parietal lobe. In the new study, researchers investigated these patients' understanding of time. Because people who speak languages written left to right, such as English or French, tend to think of timelines with the past to the left and the future to the right, the team focused on how left hemispatial neglect might alter the left side of their mental chronology—that is, their thinking about the past.

Seven French speakers with hemispatial neglect, seven stroke patients without neglect and seven healthy people participated in a simple memory study. They learned facts about a fictional 40-year-old man named David—some of which were true of him 10 years in the past and some of which would be true 10 years in the future. They were then asked to remember as many of the facts as they could and to say whether they were true of David at age 30 or age 50. Sure enough, the people who have hemispatial neglect were worse than the others at remembering facts from the past—but not from the future.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When patients with this type of brain damage draw a face, says psychologist Lera Boroditsky of the University of California, San Diego, who led the study, they might depict only the right eye and ear, or they might cluster all the face's features on the right side. With memory, she notes, “we see a mix of those: to some extent, people weren't good at remembering things that were associated with the past, and the other error people made was misremembering things that were associated with the past as though they were associated with the future.”

When someone's internal understanding of space is thrown off, it seems, their corresponding ordering of time is disrupted. Boroditsky is planning to repeat the study with Hebrew or Arabic speakers, who read—and plot timelines—from right to left, to see if they neglect the future instead of the past.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe