A Single Molecule Makes the Smallest Switch Yet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY

Scientists from Pennsylvania State University and Rice University have found the smallest switch yet: a single molecule. And because switches lie at the heart of computer memory and logic systems, the results, published in today¿s issue of Science, may hold promise for the future of molecular computing.

Using a scanning tunneling microscope, the researchers took pictures of the individual molecules¿known as phenylene ethynylene oligomers¿on a surface coated with a different chemical over time periods of up to 26 hours. The molecule takes on different shapes when it is "on" (bottom image) and "off" (top image). By varying the arrangement of molecules in the supporting layers, the scientists were able to control how often the introduced molecules switched. A more orderly environment seems to limit the ability of molecules to change their shape, or conformation, by rotating around single bonds between atoms. When this rotation is hindered, so is switching, suggesting the two are linked.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although the scientists had some success in changing the molecules from the "on" state to the "off" one, turning them on proved more difficult. "It had been predicted that single molecules did not switch, but we proved they did and we identified at least part of the mechanism," says Paul Weiss, a professor of chemistry at Penn State University. He cautions that they are a long way from designing applications, such as computer architecture, for the molecular switches. The next step, he says, "is figuring out how to control the molecules' movement between 'on' and 'off.'"

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe