New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

A Small Fault Caused Monday's Earthquake in Los Angeles

The fault is not significant and will likely not cause more major earthquakes in the future, seismologists say

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A small crack unzipped Monday (March 17) under the Santa Monica Mountains north of Los Angeles, waking millions of people with Southern California's largest earthquake in years.

The fracture that caused the earthquake was not on a significant fault and is unlikely to be a new source of major earthquakes, said Caltech seismologist Egill Hauksson. (An earthquake is a sudden movement that releases stored energy on a fault.) Instead, the break likely is a bit player in California's tectonic drama, a minor crack in tortured crust being squeezed between two tectonic plates. There are thousands of small, unnamed faults in Southern California.

"In Southern California you can have an earthquake anywhere," Hauksson told Live Science's Our Amazing Planet. "What's important is the plate boundary here is complex and this small earthquake is a minute part of that."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Because the earthquake did not rupture the ground and slipped less than a mile (1.6 kilometers), geologists may never pin the shaking on a specific fault, said Robert Graves, a research scientist with the U.S. Geological Survey.

The epicenter of yesterday's magnitude-4.4 earthquake, dubbed the "Shamrock Shake" by some Angelenos, falls in a belt of seismicity that stretches from north of the Santa Monica Mountains south toward Los Angeles. The 6:25 a.m. quake was centered in Encino at a depth of 6.1 miles (9.9 km). The line of earthquakes that includes the Shamrock Shake sits between several major fault zones, including the Santa Monica Fault and the Sierra Madre Fault.

The quake may have relieved stress accumulating since the magnitude-6.7 Northridge earthquake rattled the city in 1994, Hauksson said. Yesterday's earthquake was west of the Northridge quake epicenter. [In Photos: Northridge Earthquake 20th Anniversary]

"It's possible that this is some minor readjustment in the crust, because of the Northridge earthquake," Hauksson said.

But the moderate earthquake, which was 900 times weaker than the Northridge quake, might also have alleviated squeezing caused by the San Andreas Fault's big bend, Hauksson said. Where the San Andreas Fault kinks, the Pacific Plate and the North America Plate push together instead of sliding past one another, as they do elsewhere along the major fault. The compression creates hundreds of faults in Southern California and pushes up the spectacular mountain ranges that ring Los Angeles, including the Santa Monica Mountains and the San Gabriel Mountains.

Copyright 2014 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

LiveScience is one of the biggest and most trusted popular science websites operating today, reporting on the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world.

More by LiveScience

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe