A Star's Last Breath

Supernova dust fell to Earth in Antarctic meteorites

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Two primitive meteorites collected in Antarctica appear to contain grains of silica—the stuff of quartz and sand—forged in a stellar explosion that predates the birth of the solar system. In fact, some researchers believe that it was just such an explosion, or supernova, that triggered the solar system's formation from a cloud of dust and gas billions of years ago. Whether or not the Antarctic meteorites contain a record of that fateful cataclysm, they do contain a supernova by-product that has never before been found on Earth.

Presolar grains stand out from the rest because of their unusual mix of chemical isotopes, “which cannot be explained by any known process acting in the solar system,” according to a study in the May 1 issue of Astrophysical Journal Letters. Only nuclear reactions within stars can explain the grains' composition. Some presolar grains in the nascent solar system's cloud spilled from nearby supernovae, and some seem to have arrived on winds expelled from aging stars.

In the new study, Pierre Haenecour of Washington University in St. Louis and his colleagues analyzed two meteorites collected in Antarctica in 2003. Both harbor presolar grains of silica (SiO2), the researchers found, as evidenced by the grains' enrichment in a heavy isotope of oxygen known as oxygen 18. That signature points to the grains' formation in a type II supernova—the explosion initiated by the collapse of a massive star's core. Other scientists had spotted presolar silica in meteorites before, but those grains had different isotopic signatures that indicated that they came from an aging star called an asymptotic giant branch (AGB) star rather than from a supernova.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Amassing and analyzing these presolar grains is more than just an exercise in interstellar history—a shock wave from a nearby supernova or the gentler expulsions of an AGB star could have stirred a cloud of dust and gas to collapse into the system of sun and planets that we inhabit today. Collecting presolar detritus allows astrophysicists a glimpse into the violent inner workings of dying stars and may ultimately help pinpoint just how the solar system came to be.

John Matson is a former reporter and editor for Scientific American who has written extensively about astronomy and physics.

More by John Matson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 1This article was published with the title “A Star's Last Breath” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 1 (), p. 25
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0713-25a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe