A Superplume Is the Reason Africa Is Splitting Apart

Primordial gases confirm the cause of the East African Rift

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Africa is splitting in two. The reason: a geologic rift runs along the eastern side of the continent that one day, many millions of years in the future, will be replaced with an ocean. Scientists have argued for decades about what is causing this separation of tectonic plates. Geophysicists thought it was a superplume, a giant section of the earth's mantle that carries heat from near the core up to the crust. As evidence, they pointed to two large plateaus (one in Ethiopia and one in Kenya) that they said were created when a superplume pushed up the mantle. Geochemists were not able to confirm that theory. Instead they thought there might be two small, unrelated plumes pushing up the plateaus individually. The theories did not align, says David Hilton, a geochemist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, Calif. “There was a mismatch between the chemistry and the physics.”

So in 2006 and 2011 Hilton headed to East Africa to see whether he could lay the argument to rest. He and his team decided to use gases emanating from the rift to determine how it was created. Donning gas masks, they hiked to the tops of volcanoes in Tanzania and Ethiopia and climbed into mazuku (the Swahili word for “evil wind”)—geothermal vents and depressions where deadly gases accumulate and often kill animals. At these locations, the team collected samples of rocks deposited during eruptions, including olivines, crystals that trap volcanic gases like a bottle.

Back home in California, Hilton crushed the rocks inside a vacuum to release their gases. He was looking for helium 3, an isotope of helium present when the planet was forming that was trapped in the earth's core. Hilton figured that if rocks around both the Ethiopian and Kenyan plateaus contained this primordial gas, that would at least confirm that underground mantle plumes created them. The readings showed that, indeed, both plateaus contained helium 3. But Hilton and his group still had to wonder: Was one superplume behind it all? Or were there a couple of lesser plumes?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To answer this question, they turned to another primordial gas trapped in the mantle: neon 22. They found that neon 22 existed in both plateaus and that the ratios of helium to neon in those locations matched, results published in April in Geophysical Research Letters. That meant that the plume underneath both plateaus was of the same material and of the same age. Hence, there was one common superplume. The geophysicists, it turns out, had been right all along.

“The ‘naysayers’ who claim that the rifting and plume activity are unconnected—and some who would even deny a mantle plume is present—no longer have a leg to stand on,” says Pete Burnard, a geochemist at the French National Center for Scientific Research, who was not involved in the latest work.

The African superplume will provide scientists with easier access to study the earth's inner workings (another lies underneath the Pacific Ocean). Hilton and his team are now measuring how much carbon the mantle in East Africa is releasing, how old it is and if it has been recycled from carbon originally captured on the surface billions of years ago. This information, Hilton says, will help geologists figure out how the earth's layers interact on a longer time scale, including the hundreds of millions of years it takes for continents to form—and split.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe