A Universal Gene for Keeping Developmental Time

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Creatures as diverse as worms, sea urchins, flies, fish and humans may all march to the beat of the same drummer when it comes to developmental timing. According to a study published today in the journal Nature, researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School have discovered that a tiny RNA gene known to regulate development in the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegansis found in the genomes of all animals whose left and right sides are basically identical. (This excludes more primitive animals such as jellyfish and corals.) The commonality of this molecular timekeeper, which is encoded by a gene dubbed let-7, suggests that it evolved in the last common ancestor of these animals nearly a billion years ago. If substantiated, the finding could prove critical to understanding how creatures control the orchestration of cells as they develop from fertilized egg to adult.

Team leader Gary Ruvkun and his colleagues first described let-7 in February, having discovered it in C. elegans. Subsequent work documented its ubiquitous presence among bilaterally symmetrical animals. Specifically, they found that let-7 is expressed at certain times--such as just before metamorphosis in the fruit fly--thus hinting strongly at a role in controlling developmental transitions. But let-7 doesn¿t act alone. Rather it is part of a "genetic cascade" involving so-called target genes and effector genes. Intriguingly, the researchers were able to identify let-7¿s target gene in the fly and in vertebrates, which suggests that the entire genetic cascade has been conserved over the course of evolution. Yet whether let-7 is used in the same way in all of these different animals remains to be seen, according to CNRS researcher Andre Adoutte. "With time, the regulators and effectors of let-7 in several phyla will no doubt be identified," he writes in an accompanying commentary. "Then we will be able to answer the question of whetherthis timekeeping mechanism is truly universal."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe