New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

A Wandering Mind

Neon light portrait of thoughtful woman touching chin while contemplating.

Scientific American MIND, November - December 2021; Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In 2017 Scientific American published an important article by Stanford University professor of medicine Marcia L. Stefanick that detailed all the ways modern medicine has failed women—namely, by basing their care on research findings gathered predominately on men and men alone. To be sure, improvements have been made to treating women in cardiovascular health, mental health care and prescription dosing, but much research on women’s health is still in early days. In this issue, journalist Katharine Sanderson covers the latest example of this discrepancy: head injury (see “Why Sports Concussions Are Worse for Women”). There’s no denying now that equality in medical research would be a great way to start leveling the playing field.

Our cover story this month explores the intriguing effects that automaticity—that is, mindless activity—can have on mental and physical performance (see “Sometimes Mindlessness Is Better Than Mindfulness”). As environmental anthropologist Peter Sutoris writes in Opinion, our hyperconsumeristic culture prizes productivity above all else (see “To Solve the Environmental Crisis, We Must Foster the Power to Imagine”). It may be that easing up on our relentless concentration and letting the mind wander may have benefits that go beyond an individual’s scope.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Mind Vol 32 Issue 6This article was published with the title “A Wandering Mind” in SA Mind Vol. 32 No. 6 (), p. 2
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1121-2

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe