New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

A Whole New View

An artist’s illustration of the German-Russian telescope called SRG, which will detect millions of new supermassive black holes, and hundreds of thousands of stars.

© ROSCOSMOS, DLR, Lavochkin Association, MPE and IKI

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In 1800 astronomer William Herschel kicked off more than a century of discovery when he detected infrared radiation. It was the first observation of electromagnetic radiation other than visible light and the first verification that there is more in the universe than humans can see with their eyes. In fact, the human eye perceives only about 0.0035 percent of the total electromagnetic radiation in the universe. Therefore, with all our light-based telescopes, on Earth and in space, we observe a mere fraction of the radiation that fills the cosmos. To literally expand our field of view, several space missions have gathered data on the universe in x-rays, ultraviolet rays, gamma rays, and so on. Davide Castelvecchi reports on an exciting telescope launched this summer that will collect high-energy x-rays from the universe, with aims to create a 3-D map of never before seen supermassive black holes and some 700,000 stars. It gives a new definition to the term “eye-opening” (see “New Space Telescope Will Map the Universe in High-Energy X-rays”).

Elsewhere in this issue, Anil Ananthaswamy covers the recent breakthroughs that are bringing a quantum Internet closer to reality (see “The Quantum Internet Is Emerging, One Experiment at a Time”). And Shannon Hall writes about the growing momentum for renewed explorations of Venus (see “Venus, Earth’s Evil Twin, Beckons Space Agencies”). In our own cosmic backyard and beyond, there is so much more to see.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Space & Physics Vol 2 Issue 4This article was published with the title “A Whole New View” in SA Space & Physics Vol. 2 No. 4 (), p. 2
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanspace0819-2

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe