Live from Vancouver: Dispatches from the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science

The February AAAS conference brought together scientists, policymakers and educators from across the globe

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

If You're Happy, How You Know It [Podcast]
Social scientist Roly Russell, of the Sandhill Institute in British Columbia, talked with Scientific American's Mark Fischetti at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science about potentially better measures than GDP of a nation's well-being

Fermilab Set to Reveal “Interesting” Higgs Boson Results
Last fall, the Tevatron accelerator at Fermilab in Illinois shut down for good, but we shouldn't count it out of the Higss hunt just yet

Being Happy: Social and Natural Factors Are More Important Than Money (Especially in Costa Rica)
It’s easy to find an online test that will purportedly tell you how happy you are. But how happy are the people of an entire nation?

Fracking Could Work If Industry Would Come Clean
Resistance to hydraulic fracturing in the U.S. has risen steadily in recent months


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Microchip Implant Gives Medication On Command
A tiny chip implanted under the skin can dole out dozens of doses of osteoporosis medication right on schedule

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe