Abnormal RNA, Not Faulty Proteins, May Cause Myotonic Dystrophy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers at the University of Minnesota have found that faulty proteins may not be the only culprits when it comes to some hereditary diseases. Their findings, published in the current issue of the journal Science, suggest that abnormal RNA¿the molecule that translates the DNA code into proteins¿may cause myotonic dystrophy.

Laura P. W. Ranum and her colleagues investigated the causes of a form of myotonic dystrophy (DM) known as DM2, analyzing the clinical and genetic features of 71 individuals from 26 families that have the hereditary disease. Earlier research had indicated that mutations of genes on chromosomes 19q13 and 3q21 cause DM1 and DM2, respectively. Yet exactly how these mutations lead to disease has puzzled investigators because they occur in regions of the chromosomes that are transcribed into RNA but they do not code for proteins. The new work indicates that DM2 occurs when a mutation on chromosome 3q21 is transcribed into RNA. Then, instead of moving out into the cell where it would be translated into a protein, the RNA accumulates in the cell's nucleus, thus causing problems.

"In the past the focus has been on protein abnormalities as the cause of genetic disorders," Ranum remarks, noting that RNA was thought to have little or no role in the matter. The new findings alter that picture considerably. Says team member John Day, "for the first time, there is indisputable evidence that RNA itself can cause disease."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe