50, 100 & 150 Years Ago: Abusing Coal, Creating Diamond and Calculating Wood

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


JULY 1955
NEW ELEMENT--"For a few days early this year there was something new under the sun, but not much of it. Chemists at the University of California had made 17 atoms of element 101. The substance, named mendelevium (abbreviated Mv) [now Md] after the father of the periodic table, was produced by bombarding element 99 with energetic alpha particles from a cyclotron. The isotope thereby obtained, the atomic weight of which is 256, decays by spontaneous fission with a half-life somewhere between half an hour and several hours."

COAL--"The analysis of coal into its elemental constituents tells us almost nothing about it as a chemical substance. For this we must know the chemical structure of coal, the way in which its atoms are linked to form molecules. The effort is worthwhile because the more that is known about how coal is put together, the more precisely can it be taken apart to yield desirable chemical substances. Already one improved process has made from coal over 200 basic chemicals, some entirely new or in quantities never before achieved. It is this fact that leads chemists and conservationists to conclude that the most wasteful thing to do with coal is merely to burn it."

Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Abusing Coal -- Creating Diamond -- Calculating Wood” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican072005-15yx2UpRlocEe1mtm5xIkN

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe