New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

50, 100 & 150 Years Ago: Accident Epidemiolog, An Unsinkable Ship and Truth Serum

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


AUGUST 1957
ROAD DATA— “Automobile accidents in the U.S. are now the subject of a large-scale investigation as if they were an epidemic—as they are. The Department of the Army, the American Medical Association and other major groups are studying many phases of the matter, from the design of tollbooths to the personality of truck drivers. Among other significant findings are that sedatives and tranquilizing drugs dull a driver’s skill, and that the dangerous effects of an evening of drinking may last as long as 18 hours, regardless of coffee therapy.”

AUGUST 1907
RMS LUSITANIA— “On a preliminary speed trial for the new turbine liner ‘Lusitania’ of the Cunard Line, the great ship easily reached a speed of 25 knots, and this in spite of the fact that her bottom was ‘heavily coated with the chemically-saturated mud of the River Clyde.’ The constructive features of the ship are novel, and because of her mammoth proportions are of unusual interest. The double bottom, covering the whole of the ship’s length, is 5 feet in depth. There are nine decks in all, and the hull is divided into 175 separate water-tight compartments, which, surely, establishes the claim that she is unsinkable by any ordinary disaster.”

Images of the RMS Lusitania

Images of the RMS Lusitania

Scientific American Magazine Vol 297 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Accident Epidemiology -- An Unsinkable Ship -- Truth Serum” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 297 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican082007-2jSzwuH5W8xnsTYCgb93ea

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe