Adapting to Promiscuity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Among primates, certain species are quite promiscuous. Female Barbary macaques, for example, mate with as many as 10 males each day during estrus--risky behavior as far as sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) go. Or is it? The results of a study published in last Friday's issue of the journal Science suggest that the primate immune system may have adapted to this kind of behavior. According to the new report, females with more mating partners have higher white blood cell counts than do those who stick with a single mate.

Postdoctoral researcher >Charles L. Nunn of the University of Virginia and his colleagues set out to test whether evolutionary increases in three factors of disease risk--namely group size and density, time spent on the ground (which increases exposure to soil-borne pathogens) and number of mating partners--correlated with similar increases in white blood cell counts. Their analyses reveal that of those three factors, only the risk of STDs appears to have shaped variability in primate immune systems. The team concludes that "the precise reason for this result requires further study," but they propose that "it might be that STDs are much more common in nature than previously thought, or that behavioral mechanisms to avoid infectious disease are less effective against sexually transmitted pathogens."

Not all primates have this pumped-up immune system, ready to protect against promiscuity. White blood cell counts in humans, for instance, are apparently more consistent with monogamy. At least one reason for this difference shows up in a study of bees, which appears in the same Science issue. This work demonstrates that immunity can be costly, especially in an animal that is already under stress. "When an animal is already stressed, mounting an immune response may place excessive demands on stores of an essential factor," such as a rare amino acid or energy, >Andrew F. Read and Judith E. Allen of the University of Edinburgh explain in a commentary accompanying the two reports.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Read and Allen further note that whether the correlation between STDs and higher white blood cell counts among primates will hold up remains to be seen. Although the overall white blood cell counts are higher in promiscuous primate species in this latest report, numbers of the specific cell types were sometimes counterintuitive. "Certainly the idea that immune response variations in nature can be understood in terms of fitness costs and benefits is appealing," they assert. "The principle challenge is to marry this idea with our detailed understanding of how immunity works."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe