New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Adapting to Promiscuity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Among primates, certain species are quite promiscuous. Female Barbary macaques, for example, mate with as many as 10 males each day during estrus--risky behavior as far as sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) go. Or is it? The results of a study published in last Friday's issue of the journal Science suggest that the primate immune system may have adapted to this kind of behavior. According to the new report, females with more mating partners have higher white blood cell counts than do those who stick with a single mate.

Postdoctoral researcher >Charles L. Nunn of the University of Virginia and his colleagues set out to test whether evolutionary increases in three factors of disease risk--namely group size and density, time spent on the ground (which increases exposure to soil-borne pathogens) and number of mating partners--correlated with similar increases in white blood cell counts. Their analyses reveal that of those three factors, only the risk of STDs appears to have shaped variability in primate immune systems. The team concludes that "the precise reason for this result requires further study," but they propose that "it might be that STDs are much more common in nature than previously thought, or that behavioral mechanisms to avoid infectious disease are less effective against sexually transmitted pathogens."

Not all primates have this pumped-up immune system, ready to protect against promiscuity. White blood cell counts in humans, for instance, are apparently more consistent with monogamy. At least one reason for this difference shows up in a study of bees, which appears in the same Science issue. This work demonstrates that immunity can be costly, especially in an animal that is already under stress. "When an animal is already stressed, mounting an immune response may place excessive demands on stores of an essential factor," such as a rare amino acid or energy, >Andrew F. Read and Judith E. Allen of the University of Edinburgh explain in a commentary accompanying the two reports.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Read and Allen further note that whether the correlation between STDs and higher white blood cell counts among primates will hold up remains to be seen. Although the overall white blood cell counts are higher in promiscuous primate species in this latest report, numbers of the specific cell types were sometimes counterintuitive. "Certainly the idea that immune response variations in nature can be understood in terms of fitness costs and benefits is appealing," they assert. "The principle challenge is to marry this idea with our detailed understanding of how immunity works."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe