New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Advances in Ultrameasurement

Zeptoliter pipettes and quantum rulers give new meaning to the word "small"

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists use pipettes when they need to dispense well-defined volumes of liquid. Existing pipettes can deliver fluid volumes as small as an attoliter—a quintillionth, or a billionth of a billionth, of a liter.

Physicists Peter W. Sutter and Eli A. Sutter of Brookhaven National Laboratory have broken that lower limit by constructing a pipette that metes out a droplet measured in a unit that is a thousandth as small—a zeptoliter (a sextillionth of a liter). Such a minute volume can contain as little as 10,000 to as much as a million atoms of metal.

The researchers used a germanium nanowire with a solid reservoir of gold-germanium alloy at one end. They encapsulated the two-micron-long assembly in a carbon shell, which constituted the pipette. Inside a vacuum chamber, they heated and melted the alloy and then aimed an electron beam at the shell's tip. The beam bored an escape hole for the molten metal, which formed a minuscule droplet up to 40 nanometers in diameter and 35 zeptoliters in volume.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If measuring things in zeptoliters is difficult, consider doing so at a scale where the rules of classical physics cease to prevail. Quantum metrology—the field in which quantum mechanics is used to obtain highly precise measurements—has allowed physicists at Hokkaido University in Japan and the University of Bristol in England to almost double the precision of measurement when using photons to gauge distances.

The scientists have built on previous work that uses photons “entangled” in the same quantum superposition of states. The team directed two photonic pairs into an interferometer—an instrument that creates a circular beam path with mirrors in which light waves interfere with one another. Each photon splits, taking separate paths simultaneously. Four photons in an entangled state circulate around the interferometer in one direction, and another quadruplet traverses the loop in the other. The interference produced by the countercirculating photons reveals tiny differences in how far each quadruplet has traveled.

The precision measurements could, for example, be useful when using lasers to etch ultrathin circuits on computer chips.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe