Aerial Base Station

Trying again: stratospheric airships for communications

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The plan is familiar: park an antenna high in the stratosphere and then relay signals to and from devices below. Such an airborne transceiver could blanket urban areas with wireless coverage more cheaply than satellite-based alternatives while avoiding the need to build forests of mast-mounted base stations on the ground. In the past, various remote-controlled airplanes, balloons and blimps have been proposed to keep antennas aloft for months on end, but few have ever made it into the air, and none have operated commercially.

Previous failures, however, do not daunt the latest contender for the prize. This spring engineers at Sanswire Networks, an Atlanta-based Wi-Fi provider, plan to test a prototype of a high-tech airship that they claim could supply mobile communications service to major metropolitan areas for as long as 18 months at a stretch. "It's like a big pontoon boat in the sky," says company chairman Michael K. Molen. If the concept proves successful, fleets of whale-shaped "Stratellites"--short for stratospheric satellites--will fly 20 kilometers up to where the air is so thin that solar-powered electric motors can keep the $10-million-plus ships in geostationary "orbits."

Beyond standard financial and political difficulties, these projects face formidable technical difficulties, observes aerospace engineer James D. DeLaurier of the University of Toronto. A veteran of a late-1980s effort to fly a microwave beam¿powered drone, DeLaurier explains that the region above "20 kilometers is no atmospheric Shangri-la, as was once thought." Despite the rarefied air in the stratosphere, wind pressures are still significant, he notes, adding that the "area is full of ozone, ultraviolet radiation and even atomic oxygen, all of which degrade materials over time." Helium management is another issue: the enclosing envelope bag, which has to be thin to reduce weight, "looks like Highway 95" to helium molecules, which zip right through it, DeLaurier says. "So you have to have a way to replenish lost lifting gas."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To overcome such obstacles, Sanswire has hooked up with Vernon Koenig, an expert in lighter-than-air technology who designed an airship for an earlier, underfinanced effort. Called Sanswire 1, the one-third-scale prototype will rely on a lightweight skin of body-armor-grade polyethylene fibers and incorporate thousands of square meters of photovoltaic film on the upper exterior. Once builders install the engines, high-altitude propellers and a triple-redundant computer guidance system, flight-testing will be conducted above a California U.S. Air Force base.

A full-size Stratellite would be nearly as large as a football field. It would be able to loft a 1.5-ton payload using mostly helium and would employ nitrogen to maintain the shape of its outer skin as the craft rises and falls. Some 37,000 cubic meters of helium inside will expand nearly 17-fold by the time the ship reaches cruising altitude. The commercial airship will most likely include a technology to manufacture lifting gas, perhaps hydrogen, to replace lost helium.

Molen says the aerodynamic lifting body-type shape means the airship will be able to "fly" under power, maneuvering its way up rather than simply floating higher. Presumably this approach will enable the ship to navigate past the jet stream and maintain its position.

As with the earlier, similar efforts, it all sounds promising. But the question remains whether the idea will really fly.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe