New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Aerial Monitoring Provides Early Sinkhole Detection

Monitoring from above predicts sinkholes months before they occur

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Along the shores of the Dead Sea, the solidity of the ground underfoot cannot be taken for granted. In recent years sinkholes, up to 20 meters in depth, have been cropping up at a rapid clip. The collapses have rendered a recreation area unusable and have reportedly trapped a handful of people who required rescue. To get ahead of the problem, a team of scientists identified the signs of an emerging sinkhole from subtle elevation changes in soil. Now they are using those indicators to predict collapses ahead of time.

The sinkhole problem stems from the shrinking of the saline Dead Sea, which thousands of years ago deposited thick layers of salt in the soil. Now fresh groundwater has infiltrated areas left dry by the Dead Sea's retreat, dissolving the ancient salt layers and weakening the ground under former lake bed and shoreline.

To spot developing sinkholes, the scientists monitored the region with radar-equipped satellites and laser-ranging aircraft. Meanwhile one researcher paid regular visits to the study area to spot recent sinkholes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Once new basins opened up, the scientists returned to their data bank to identify subsidence—on the scale of millimeters—in the months leading up to the collapse. The team is using those patterns of emergence to sound the alarm about future collapses. “In one case, we alerted the government, and they designed a road that bypasses the sinkhole area,” says study co-author Ran N. Nof, a geophysicist at Tel Aviv University.

It remains to be seen whether the approach would work in Florida and other sinkhole-plagued regions. University of South Florida geologist Timothy Dixon notes that Florida's moist air interferes with radar imagery and encourages vegetation, “which makes it hard to compare one radar image with the next.”

About Arielle Duhaime-Ross

Arielle is a Scientific American editorial intern. She covers a variety of topics including health, technology and zoology.

More by Arielle Duhaime-Ross
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 4This article was published with the title “The Holey Land” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 4 (), p. 21
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1013-21

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe