Africa's Great Apes in Peril

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

The future of our closest living relatives is much more fragile than previously thought. According to a report published online today by the journal Nature, the number of great apes in the wilds of western Africa has been more than halved over the past two decades. If the current trend continues, scientists say, these primates could suffer population declines of another 80 percent over the next 30 years, endangering their survival.

Peter Walsh of Princeton University and the Wildlife Conservation Society led an international team of researchers who studied wild populations of great apes in Gabon, which is located in central Africa. The small equatorial nation still retains 80 percent of its forest cover and is a stronghold for wild chimpanzees and gorillas. The team traipsed through 4,800 kilometers of dense jungle on several surveys to count ape nests and determined that the ape population declined by 56 percent between the early 1980s and 2002. "This is a catastrophic decline of great apes in an area that contains the bulk of the world's remaining populations," Walsh says. "If chimps and gorillas continue to disappear at the current rate, our closest relatives will be confined to a few small pockets in a matter of years."

Previous estimates of the plight of Africa's great apes had relied heavily on the assumption that the amount of undisturbed forest cover was a good indicator of ape abundance in a region. But the new study highlights the impact of factors other than deforestation that can kill wild chimps and gorillas, namely illegal hunting and the Ebola virus. The authors conclude that "without aggressive investments in law enforcement, protected areas management and Ebola prevention, the next decade will see our closest relatives pushed to the brink of extinction."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American