New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Agent Orange Linked to Leukemia

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In 1991 Congress mandated a series of studies every two years for 10 years examining the effects of herbicides, such as Agent Orange, that were used in Vietnam. From that work, researchers found compelling evidence that associated exposure to the chemicals with soft-tissue sarcoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease and chloracne, a skin disease, among other conditions. Now a new review of hundreds of these studies from the U.S. and abroad has uncovered another possible link¿this time between Agent Orange and the development of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in the children of Vietnam veterans.

"No firm evidence links exposure to the herbicides with most childhood cancers," says Irva Hertz-Picciotto, an epidemiologist from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill who chaired a panel of experts conducting the study, "but new research does suggest that some kind of connection exists between AML in children and their fathers' military service in Vietnam or Cambodia. Additional research is needed to shed more light on the issue."

The scientists estimate that Agent Orange spraying may have increased the risk of AML in veteran's children by 70 to 300 percent. "Two studies in particular support this conclusion," Hertz-Picciotto says. "One is a case-control study of AML in which self-reported service in Vietnam or Cambodia was associated with an elevated risk after adjusting for numerous potentially confounding lifestyle and sociodemographic factors. The other, a study of what illnesses children of Australian Vietnam veterans had been diagnosed with, found a greater than four-fold risk although most confounding factors were not controlled for."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe