Agent Orange Linked to Leukemia

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In 1991 Congress mandated a series of studies every two years for 10 years examining the effects of herbicides, such as Agent Orange, that were used in Vietnam. From that work, researchers found compelling evidence that associated exposure to the chemicals with soft-tissue sarcoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease and chloracne, a skin disease, among other conditions. Now a new review of hundreds of these studies from the U.S. and abroad has uncovered another possible link¿this time between Agent Orange and the development of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in the children of Vietnam veterans.

"No firm evidence links exposure to the herbicides with most childhood cancers," says Irva Hertz-Picciotto, an epidemiologist from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill who chaired a panel of experts conducting the study, "but new research does suggest that some kind of connection exists between AML in children and their fathers' military service in Vietnam or Cambodia. Additional research is needed to shed more light on the issue."

The scientists estimate that Agent Orange spraying may have increased the risk of AML in veteran's children by 70 to 300 percent. "Two studies in particular support this conclusion," Hertz-Picciotto says. "One is a case-control study of AML in which self-reported service in Vietnam or Cambodia was associated with an elevated risk after adjusting for numerous potentially confounding lifestyle and sociodemographic factors. The other, a study of what illnesses children of Australian Vietnam veterans had been diagnosed with, found a greater than four-fold risk although most confounding factors were not controlled for."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe