Agriculture in California

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At the last meeting of the Farmers' Club of this city, Mr. Shelton exhibited some speci mens of the Amole or Soap Plant used by the natives for washing purposes. It resembles the onion and is propagated from off-shoots, constant use of it, however, inflames the hands. From the fibre of the plant an excel lent article ot hemp could be made. The cultivation of the onion had been attended with the most triumphant success. The same might be said of the beet, which grew to an enormous size. It would be no exaggeration to say that beets weighing one hundred pounds each could be grown in California.— In the places were. the largest beets were raised, it should be remarked that the sub soil was moist. The sycamore and button- wood trees grew with great luxuriance in all parts of the country—as also the ash and al der. But there were many varieties of trees in California unknown in the Atlantic States. He had not noticed any species of elm or su gar maple, though there was, however, a very valuable sugar- producing tree known as the sugar pine, which grew to a great size and produced good timber; in appearance it was similar to the long cone pine. The genenl planting season throughout the country was in March and April—gardening operations commencing in February as here. Rev. Mr. Fitch observed that he had dis covered, during his journeyings in California, some six varieties of gooseberries superior to any he had before seen. The blackberries and strawberries were,.much superior to any thing we had, and the latter -were even supe rior to the >English strawberry. There was also a berry of very delicious flavor, some thing between the raspberry and the black berry, which was called the salmonberry.— That name was given it by the Oregonians, who observed that the berries which fell from bushes overhanging the rivers were eagerly devoured by the salmon. The Chairman observed that he ha!d made a good deal of inquiry relative to the cultiva tion of the grape in South and North America west, and from what he ascertained on the subject, it appeared there was no grape that was worth anything cultivated in those re gions that was not of European stock. Rev. Mr. Fitch corroborated the statement, remarking at the same time that there was no native grape in California.worth cultivation.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 14This article was published with the title “Agriculture in California” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 14 (), p. 107
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican12181852-107e

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe