New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

AI Can Predict Potential Nutrient Deficiencies from Space

New work maps a region’s nutrient landscape

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Micronutrient deficiencies afflict more than two billion people worldwide, including 340 million children. This lack of vitamins and minerals can have serious health consequences. But diagnosing deficiencies early enough for effective treatment requires expensive, time-consuming blood draws and laboratory tests.

New research provides a more efficient approach. Computer scientist Elizabeth Bondi and her colleagues at Harvard University used publicly available satellite data and artificial intelligence to reliably pinpoint geographical areas where populations are at high risk of micronutrient deficiencies. This analysis could potentially pave the way for early public health interventions.

Existing AI systems can use satellite data to predict localized food security issues, but they typically rely on directly observable features. For example, agricultural productivity can be estimated from views of vegetation. Micronutrient availability is harder to calculate. After seeing research showing that areas near forests tend to have better dietary diversity, Bondi and her colleagues were inspired to identify lesser-known markers for potential malnourishment. Their work shows that combining data such as vegetation cover, weather and water presence can suggest where populations will lack iron, vitamin B12 or vitamin A.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The team examined raw satellite measurements and consulted with local public health officials, then used AI to sift through the data and pinpoint key features. For instance, a food market, inferred based on roads and buildings visible, was vital for predicting a community's risk level. The researchers then linked these features to specific nutrients lacking in four regions' populations across Madagascar. They used real-world biomarker data (blood samples tested in labs) to train and test their AI program.

Predictions of regional-level micronutrient deficiency in populations outside the training data sets met, and sometimes exceeded, the accuracy of estimates based on surveys administered by local public health officials. “Our work showcases a method that allows for identification and targeting of vulnerable populations for nutritional support that may supplement ... expensive and invasive procedures,” Bondi says. The study was detailed at the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence's 2022 virtual meeting.

“This is a novel contribution that highlights AI's potential to advance public health,” says Emory University epidemiologist Christine Ekenga, who was not involved with the study. Collecting health data in low-resource settings can be difficult because of cost and infrastructure constraints, she adds, and “the authors have validated a method that can overcome these challenges.”

The researchers aim to develop a software application that extends this analysis to other countries that have public satellite data. “We hope that this application could allow public health officials to interact with the insights our system can provide and help to inform interventions,” Bondi says.

Rachel Berkowitz is a freelance science writer and a corresponding editor for Physics Magazine. She is based in Vancouver, British Columbia, and Eastsound, Wash.

More by Rachel Berkowitz
Scientific American Magazine Vol 326 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Vitamin Map” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 326 No. 6 (), p. 20
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0622-20a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe