AI Tool Could Help Diagnose Alzheimer’s

A new algorithm accurately identified more than 90 percent of people who would advance to an Alzheimer’s diagnosis in about six years 

PET scan of a brain.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

An estimated 5.7 million people in the U.S. have Alzheimer’s disease—the most common type of dementia—and that number is expected to more than double by 2050. Early diagnosis is crucial for patients to benefit from the few therapies available. But no single assay or scan can deliver a conclusive diagnosis while a person is alive; instead doctors have to conduct numerous clinical and neuropsychological tests. So there is growing interest in developing artificial intelligence to identify Alzheimer’s based on brain imaging.

Researchers at the University of California, San Francisco, have now successfully trained an AI algorithm to recognize one of the early signs of Alzheimer’s—a reduction in the brain’s glucose consumption—in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. The algorithm accurately predicted an eventual Alzheimer’s diagnosis in nearly all the test cases, according to the study.

In PET imaging, trace amounts of a radioactive compound are ingested or injected into the body, producing three-dimensional images of metabolism, circulation and other cellular activity. PET is well suited for an AI diagnostic tool because Alzheimer’s causes subtle changes in the brain’s metabolism that begin years before neural tissue starts to degrade, says study co-author Jae Ho Sohn, a radiologist at U.C.S.F. These changes are “very hard for radiologists to pick up,” he notes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The algorithm was trained and tested on 2,100 PET brain images from about 1,000 people 55 years and older. The images came from a 12-year study that tracked people who would ultimately be diagnosed with Alzheimer’s, as well as those with mild memory declines and healthy control subjects. The algorithm was trained on 90 percent of the data and tested on the remaining 10 percent. It was then retested on a second, independent data set from 40 patients monitored for 10 years. The algorithm was highly sensitive and was able to recognize 81 percent of the patients in the first test group and 100 percent in the second who would be diagnosed with Alzheimer’s six years later, on average. The findings were published in February in Radiology.

The algorithm is based on “deep learning,” a machine-learning technique that uses artificial neural networks programmed to learn from examples. “This is one of the first promising, preliminary applications of deep learning to the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s,” says Christian Salvatore, a physicist at Italy’s National Research Council, who was not involved in the study. “The model performs very well when identifying patients with mild or late” diagnoses, he says, but catching it in the earliest stages “remains one of the most critical open issues in this field.”

Editor’s Note (5/8/19): This story was edited after posting to replace an image whose description could not be fully confirmed.

Rod McCullom is a science writer whose work has appeared in Undark, Nature, the Atlantic, and M.I.T. Technology Review, among other magazines.

More by Rod McCullom
Scientific American Magazine Vol 320 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Alzheimer's AI” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 320 No. 5 (), p. 20
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0519-20

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe