Air Pollutants Thwart Flower-Seeking Bugs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Will Dunham

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - You think your nose likes flowers? Well, certainly not as much as the tobacco hornworn moth. In fact, its life depends on it.

These moths, whose olfactory abilities are as good as a bloodhound's and vastly better than a human's, can fly up to 80 miles (130 km) a night searching for their favorite flowers such as the Sacred Datura.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The nectar of these fragrant white, trumpet-shaped flowers that bloom only once at night is an important food source for the moths, which pollinate the flowers. Females also go to the flowers to lay eggs. After hatching, the larvae eat the plant's leaves.

Scientists have wondered how pollinating insects such as these moths track down the flowers they need and whether competing odors - natural and manmade - can mess things up.

In a study published on Friday in the journal Science, researchers placed the moths in a laboratory wind tunnel and exposed them to an array of odors such as car and truck exhaust fumes and fragrances of other plants.

Human sources of pollution fouled up their ability to find flowers and changed how the flower's scent was processed by olfactory neurons in the moth's brain.

"Pollinators like bees, butterflies and moths use their sense of smell to locate flowers from long distances, but we found that scent from neighboring vegetation, and even pollutants given off from vehicle exhaust, can disrupt the moth's behavior," University of Washington biology professor Jeffrey Riffell said.

"Now for the moths that are flying long distances, they can't adequately smell the flowers and at times won't even know the flowers are there," Riffell added. "We really need to conduct more experiments to find out if these pollutants, or even certain plants, might similarly disrupt other pollinators, like honeybees, that are agriculturally important."

The tobacco hornworm moth - a large, nocturnal insect with a wingspan of about 4 inches (10 cm) - ranges from Canada to Central America, including across the United States. In the U.S. Southwest, their favored flower is the Sacred Datura, also known as angel's trumpets.

In a wind tunnel and a computer-controlled odor-stimulus system, the moths were tested to see how well they could distinguish different intensities of Sacred Datura fragrance, as well as mixes of background odors from other plants such as the creosote bushes that often grow nearby. The researchers also piped in chemicals such as those emitted in vehicle exhaust.

The researchers tracked the neuron pathways activated by placing an electrode into the moth's antennal lobe. The antennae serve as an insect's nose. The antennal lobe is the part of the brain that processes odors from the antennae.

The moths can zero in on flowers hundreds of yards (meters) away if there are not too many competing odors. Such odors mess with the balance of excitation and inhibition in the olfactory system, keeping the moths from recognizing the flowers.

"The total combination of dynamic odors, including floral signature odors as well as anthropogenic pollutants, can affect the success of olfactory-based resource finding," University of Arizona researcher Leif Abrell added.

 

(Reporting by Will Dunham. Editing by Andre Grenon)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe